We have observed a gradual increase of the sea level during the last decades. It is a slow increase, and despite the alarmist attitudes of some, it is nothing to be worried about. By analyzing the data and looking into the matter clearly, we can find that this is a normal process that has happened before.
Even though we have documented a rise in the polar ice melting, this isn't the reason for the increase in the sea level. That ice is already in the water, so it displaces it already. Think of ice cubes in your glass of water, when they melt it doesn't make the water from the glass spill over. The same thing happens when the ice cap melts. Since the Ice is 90% already in water, when it goes into a liquid state, nothing drastic happens.
When it comes to the source for the increase in the sea level, we just don't know where it comes from. Many scientific agencies like NASA have stated that they simply don't know from where all this new water is coming. So it is still a great unknown
The sea level has been fluctuating ever since the continents have emerged from the primordial ocean. We have seen many changes through the eons, half of our current landmass was submerged at one point. The same will probably happen later, and it will be through a slow and gradual process. Enough time will pass for humanity to adjust
The reading states that there is a rise in sea level over the past decades and it is a normal process that has happened before. Contrast to that, the lecture tells that it is going to be very effective and abnormal process.
The lecture mentions that the main reason of increase of sea level is due to melting of thermofrosts. The increase of sea level doesn’t depend on melting of polar ice caps and no relation with it. Due to the melting of thermofrosts, i.e., ice on land the water level is getting increased and the amount of land is decreasing gradually.
It is mentioned that water is growing in an abnormal way and even NASA is stating that it is unknown to them. Contrary to that, NASA knows that thermofrosts have a huge impact on sea level which they are not publisizing to the world.
The lecture casts a doubt on the statement humans need not worry about this effect. But, the lecture mentions that it will have a huge impact on human life. Thermofrosts are melting due to increase of temperature and burning excess amount of fossil fuels. If this doesn’t happen then, around 10,000 years there wouldn’t be any melting and increase of sea level. This will be very beneficial to human life. So, we need to act immediately on the increase of weather and global warming rather than facing dangerous consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-02 | Precarious | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | jullu | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | Ashritha Gumudavally | 60 | view |
| 2021-10-17 | himanshukmr234 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | cluelessme | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 53
- The series of recent success of unmanned flights to space mission has been able to gather a lot of information So more resources should be provided for such unmanned flights because of the higher risk and cost involved in manned missions 59
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an abnormal way" with adverb for "abnormal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... It is mentioned that water is growing in an abnormal way and even NASA is stating that it is unk...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68510638298 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56985343409 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1469857969 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.6923076923 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.30769230769 7.06452816374 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21659260453 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769000100896 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404597102032 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115553705332 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557896707664 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.