Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations Discuss both views and give ur opinions

Many people contend that some individuals choose to give help and support personally to the needy, whereas others refute this by ascertaining that others would rather offer money to local and foreign charitable organizations. Both of these points of view will be analyzed before a conclusion is reached.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why it is claimed that individual's help directly to those in need is a good way to help the needy and it is a better way and more effectively than giving the donation to functional organizations. One is that giving and help allow you to build stronger connections with other people, especially those within your community. It improves relationships, leading everyone to have a better life. Helping others can be just as fulfilling as receiving help from someone else.
On the other hand, there are good grounds for arguing that there are some people who prefer to assist the needy people to the national or international organizations. One is that is another way of making kindness things that help people who are homeless and pour, some of them are children without parents. People who do it this way could be rich people, a businessman or a merchant because they finally could find out the way to use their money. Most important, it is not a waste, but it is a helpful thing that would save more people than they could imagine. There are a lot of popular people who have always shown their kindness for charity by donating a lot of money to other foundations or oven some make their own foundations. It is all helpful and not money for nothing, but only rich people do it this way because when it comes to a national organization they would donate a lot of money. Therefore, rich people do it their way but normal people could help others too by the easier way.
In conclusion, help in any approach is good whether it is directly or indirectly.

Votes
Average: 3.3 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, therefore, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71686746988 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68074319743 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487951807229 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2259611727 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305939635636 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103101490423 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675304435738 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170470554387 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701082895192 0.056905535591 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.