Technology usher in an entirely new era for all humans where direct or indirect interaction is not considered a big problem. With the aid of technology, making relationships with people is much easier while most of these rapports are virtual. From a personal point of view, this is a negative movement since rapid and unreal relationships mean unstable and unsafe affairs.
First and foremost, finding new friends is not a difficult task thanks to technology and the internet. In the past, a friendship or a romantic affair often started from meetings on the streets, at school, or workplace. In our modern world, people only need a smart device such as a smartphone or a laptop with a good internet connection to build up a new rapport with different people from different regions. Nevertheless, according to a survey carried out in the USA about the impact of technology on humans’ relationships, 90% of these friendships or romantic affairs made online are virtual and unreliable. It is also reported in this survey that more and more people are building these virtual relationships and many of them were in trouble or under threat.
For the reason above, I affirm that this is a negative development. Virtual and vulnerable relationships via technology and online platforms pose various kinds of threats to people involved. Take Vietnam for example, since 2020, 1 out of 10 people has experienced internet fraud because of making friends with virtual strangers. Besides, building and relying on online relationships also instigate interactions among people in real life. Accordingly, the more people are dependent on online rapports, the fewer dialogues in person will be made. Gradually, society as a whole can easily become distant and impersonal.
In conclusion, technology facilitates our friend-making progress but these relationships also latent lots of danger. Therefore, it seems to me that virtual interactions among humans bring more drawbacks than benefits, in other words, a negative development.
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- Some people think that art is essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time 84
- Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people Discuss both advantages and disadvantages 73
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n easily become distant and impersonal. In conclusion, technology facilitates ou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06061166272 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2773613337 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269385690822 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085125440405 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425700193258 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165406575662 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464494144737 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n easily become distant and impersonal. In conclusion, technology facilitates ou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06061166272 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2773613337 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269385690822 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085125440405 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425700193258 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165406575662 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464494144737 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.