The graph compares the expenditure on books among 4 countries, namely Germany, France, Italy, and Australia, from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, it can be seen that there was an upward trend in the budget for buying books in all examined nations. Furthermore, citizen in Germany invested the biggest amount of money in books during a period of 20 years.
In terms of Germany and France, in 1995, books accounted for a huge fraction in customers' expenditure, with 80 million and nearly 55 million respectively. Despite significant fluctuations in 1999 and 2003, Germany and France still stood at the leading positions in the investment in books with 95 million for the former and 75 million for the latter.
Regarding the two remaining countries, at the beginning of the period, the amount of money spent on books were relatively lower in comparison with Germany and France. To be specific, Italian allocated 50 million to purchasing books, while people living in Australia only spent 30 million for the same purpose. Over a 2-decade period, the year 2005 witnessed the sharp increase in the Australia's budget for books, approximately twice as much as the initial figure, reaching a peak at about 70 million. In contrast, the figure for Italy fluctuated at 52 million from 1995 to 1999 before a steady rise at 60 million in 2005.
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 67
- Music has always been an important part of human culture To what extent do you agree with this statement and why 84
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and incl 84
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 84
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96846846847 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73469429319 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1773105216 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.555555556 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224071702699 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101896901956 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613970006787 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143045178413 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197280468856 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.