The charts show the info about the use of the Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000.
Given are the two charts delineating the proportion of European citizens surfing the internet as well as how much they spent on distance shopping in five certain countries: Germany, Sweden, France, Spain and the UK in 2000.
Perceptibly, in all of the shown nations, Sweden recorded by far the highest rate of people using the World wide web, while the reverse was true for Spain. Besides, Spanish was also at least attracted by virtual shopping compared to people from other countries mentioned.
From the bar chart, in 2000, obviously, Sweden enjoyed widespread popularity among other countries with 35% of the population devoting time on cyberspaces. The UK was the second in terms of the percentage of netizens with 20% accounted, which was followed by Germany, France and Spain. Coincidentally, the rates of them had a disproportion of 5 percent lower compared to the prior country one by one.
As the information shown from the pie chart, by far the most expenditure on common people for purchasing through the extranet were the British UKs and the Swedes with 87 and 76 euros on average in turn. Third and fourth belonged to French and German with 57 and 46 euros respectively reported. Meanwhile, acquiring merchandise from online shops was not favored by Spanish when only 10 euros was paid by each individual constituted in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | 100 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | view | |
| 2021-11-04 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | phạm khánh linh | 79 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | phạm khánh linh | 11 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two charts delineating the proporti...
^^^
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...in and the UK in 2000. Perceptibly, in all of the shown nations, Sweden recorded by far t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, incidentally, second, so, third, well, while, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02242152466 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7877016231 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636771300448 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2991897109 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139315853755 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524540624574 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488973844494 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858952902869 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419577543441 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two charts delineating the proporti...
^^^
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...in and the UK in 2000. Perceptibly, in all of the shown nations, Sweden recorded by far t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, incidentally, second, so, third, well, while, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02242152466 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7877016231 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636771300448 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2991897109 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139315853755 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524540624574 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488973844494 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858952902869 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419577543441 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.