Given is the line graph depicting the changes in the amount of money in selling color TV and black and white TV in Japan; Moreover, the salary of Japanese is also shown in a graph during a 30-year phase, commencing from 1953. Perceptibly, there was an upward trend in the volume of money in Japanese’ monthly salary, while the opposite was true for the price of two types of television.
When it comes to the volume of money in japanese’ salary, it nudged up slightly from 18 thousand Yen in the first year to 30 thousand in 1973. After that, this number continued to soar sharply and herald an escalation at 68 thousand Yen in the last year.
Turning to the volume of money in selling black and white television, from 110 thousand Yen in the first year, this number plunged extremely to under 40 thousand Yen in 1963. Beside that, this number recorded a steady slump to 27 and 20 thousand Yen in 1973 and 1983, respectively. The colour television appeared 8 years later from 1953 at 100 thousand Yen. There was a diminution at 40 thousand Yen to just 60 in 1973 and this number was reported to lessen consistently to just 48 thousand Yen in the last year.
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 1 The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 89
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs show changes in the trends of the urban and rural population and by different age groups from 1950 to 2040 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51184834123 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51322505418 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516587677725 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5586888577 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231453037993 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107960016191 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732486695095 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155016456529 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695176428542 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51184834123 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51322505418 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516587677725 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5586888577 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231453037993 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107960016191 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732486695095 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155016456529 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695176428542 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.