The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books, and they should not waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
it cannot be denied that public libraries are important in our lives. however, there is a group of people who suggest that those institutions should not waste their money on up-to-date technology such as software, DVDs or videos. In my opinion, this idea should not be encouraged because it can bring many negative effects to both the libraries and their users.
To start with, applying high-tech media assists public libraries to update and expand the sources of knowledge for users as soon as possible. In terms of providing books for readers, they need to involve in different steps to receive products from other press. Hence, it takes a large amount of time for readers to get access to the latest information or research. For example, some books in Russian need to be translated into English or Vietnamese before reaching the readers; however, libraries are able to update directly those original versions on their websites or fan pages for their customers without waiting for printed books.
Moreover, with higher technology adapted, library users have more opportunities to use documents in various fields and in every language. Instead of spending hours walking through a huge amount of bookshelves in the library to find suitable references, just by clicking and searching on the Internet, people can get their needs more easily and save more time. this way is much more convenient for researchers or students as well as librarians to manage all kinds of titles in the library. In addition, the librarians possess the ability to control the borrowed books and the returned book effectively.
In conclusion, the world is going to the 5.0 industrial revolution so investing money in expensive hi-tech media in public libraries is significant. it is not waste, it is used for development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-05 | VietAn97 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | Le Minh Anh | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-15 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2020-05-23 | prempro | 67 | view |
- Many people believe that the public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their money on expensive hi tech media such as software DVD s or videos Do you agree or disagree 84
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they should not waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi tech media such as computer software videos and DVDs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it cannot be denied that public libraries ...
^^
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...c libraries are important in our lives. however, there is a group of people who suggest...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...r needs more easily and save more time. this way is much more convenient for researc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...dia in public libraries is significant. it is not waste, it is used for developmen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12585034014 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74428252633 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9071504144 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.923076923 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203307931205 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663016884582 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458799974361 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12008878872 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314665130486 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.