The map below shows the changes in an American town between 1948 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words.
Given are the two maps delineating the transformations of an American town in a certain timeline, commencing from 1948 to 2010.
It is perceptible that there were drastic modifications with the development and replacement of the architecture without the multiple eliminations of the original ones over the years given.
In the north of the region, there was no change in the architecture of the town between the years 1948 and 2010. Besides, a little bit of modifications has appeared in the south of the region. The church in the corner was turned into the sports stadium which extended towards both the West and the Nouth. By contrast, there was no transformation in the number of residential houses over the years given.
Meanwhile, the most prominent of modifications over the map is on the east. Four blocks of factories were demolished to rom for the airport. Moreover, three blocks of commercial buildings was built on the left of the airport. Moving to the centre, the area of residential houses was made way for double commercial buildings which also appeared in the west where was the place of local supermarket in 1948.
- An American film actor once said Tomorrow is important and precious Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present Do you agree or disagree 89
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 61
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 1999 and 2004 90
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the transforma...
^^^
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...minations of the original ones over the years given. In the north of the region, the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...een the years 1948 and 2010. Besides, a little bit of modifications has appeared in the so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...hurch in the corner was turned into the sports stadium which extended towards both the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...e number of residential houses over the years given. Meanwhile, the most prominent o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96842105263 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99054836132 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4791304254 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10547846075 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441382610685 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700757898749 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742549418381 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696092811958 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.