The diagram shows the process for canning pears. Write a report of at least 150 words summarizing the main details and make comparisons where relevant.
The flow chart illustrates the procedure of canned pear manufacturing. It is clear that there are 14 distinct steps in this production, from picking the fruit from the trees to distributing to shops.
The process begins with pears being hand-picked in the garden. After that, they are loaded onto lorries and delivered to manufacturing factories. In the third step, when the pears have arrived at the factory, they are thoroughly rinsed with water before going under quality inspection. The qualified fruits are stored in a chiller in below zero temperature, which is then followed by the step of grading by weight.
During the next steps of the process, the pears are peeled, cored and sliced into small pieces. Next, a specific machine puts sliced pieces of fruit into cans and later seal them with tin caps. Following this, cans of fresh pear are placed onto heat for sterilization and eventually cooked. The final stages of the process involve labelling cans of cooked pear, storing in warehouse before dispatching them to wholesale and retail units.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-15 | Trang Duong | 69 | view |
- Some people believe that young people should spend more of their time with their families and less on entertainment outside the home Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- Two road tunnels in an Australia city 84
- Many people believe that zoos have no purpose in today s world and should be closed What problems do zoos bring What are the alternatives to zoos if they are closed 63
- Many people say that universities should only be offered to young students with high marks others say that they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Table showing percentages of water use for domestic industrial and agricultural sectors in 6 countries in 2003
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1091954023 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6201413522 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8174405724 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966990266478 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402915187925 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346391360771 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597056520199 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257277187131 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.