The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The change in several energies consumed by Fuel in the USA from 1980 to 2030 is displayed in the line graph, shown in quadrillion units.
Overall, the non-renewable energy had been higher and is envisaged to use increasingly. Meanwhile, the renewable one could not exceed the counterpart, even in the future.
Initially, the consumption of petrol and oil had the highest number at 35 quadrillion units, followed by that of coal and natural gas one at 20 and approximately 15 quadrillion units, respectively. Furthermore, the renewable energy consumed by Americans shared the same number at below 5 quadrillion units.
Eventually, the figure for non-renewable resources usage is gaining the upward trend and will incline year-to-year to more than 25 quadrillion units, except the natural gas which will remain stable at that number. When it comes to the ecofriendly resources use, the USA remain to consume those less than the non-sustainable ones, and the number is expected to grow at below 10 quadrillion units, but the exception is hydropower, projected as similar number as the initial considerably.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012
- The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 95
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30113636364 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19222628052 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6498618276 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113104298276 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635178082251 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750101805211 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893198437235 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837928939286 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.