Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Over the last decades,the development of technological innovations have changed human society irreversibly, especially their habits. According to some people, the number of companies mushrooming lead to numerous options for people to choose. I strongly support this statement.
On one hand, admittedly there are some valid reasons why it is believed that various choices could bring benefits to our society. To begin with, people could avoid getting bored if they have more options. For instance, now there are numerous clothing designs as well as colours and materials. Therefore, people could change their images easily and be more fashionable. In addition, various choices could respond to every personal preference. Specifically, not everyone enjoys boiled chicken so many alternative recipes have been made to serve different kinds of people, for example, fried chicken for children, steam chicken for the old,..
On other hand, it is understandable why some people believe too many choices sometimes could be a disadvantage. Firstly, people would be confused in making decisions. To illustrate, there are a huge number of products on the internet as well as different prices. Thereby, people might find it hard to find their favourite one or even could make a mistake. Secondly, the mass production may lead to low quality products. Due to the competitive marketplace, companies have to manufacture stuff with a competitive price to attract customers. In some cases, people are extremely disappointed when they receive a product that is too different from which has been advertised.
In conclusion, every coin has its two sides. Although various choices could bring us massive benefits, people should be careful in making decisions because of some disadvantages mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that it is a good idea that older people continue to work if it is possible for them to do Do you agree or disagree 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
Over the last decades,the development of technological innovation...
^^^^
Line 2, column 636, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... for children, steam chicken for the old,.. On other hand, it is understandable ...
^^
Line 2, column 637, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...for children, steam chicken for the old,.. On other hand, it is understandable w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50909090909 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93359227507 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625454545455 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6736688498 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1666666667 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2777777778 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21837790654 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648667396119 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058990720723 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125450573223 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360236529756 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.