Chevaleir memoir
The reading and lecture are both about the accuracy of the Chevalier's memoir. The author of the reading provides three theories about why the memoir is not accurate. The lecturer disputes the argument made in the article. His position is that the memoir is valid and accurate.
According to the reading, Chevalier might have taken loan from a swiss merchant. The article mentions that due to the loan he could spend a lot of money on parties and gambling. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that taking loan doesn't mean that a person is poor. Additionally, he point out that Chevelier had a lot of assets and was rich so with that he was able to spend a lot of money. But, when the money was fully spent he would take loan from the merchant because it would take time to convert assets to money.
Secondly, the author suggests that it is not possible to properly document the conversion between Chevalier and Voltaire. In the article, it is said that since the conversion was done many years ago and it's impossible to accurately present it in the memoir. The lecturer, however, asserts that Chevalier always maintained a book where he noted down the conversion every day. He goes on to say that chevalier's friends the witnesses also confirmed that he maintained a journal.
Finally, the author positions that Chevelier's great escape through a metal piece from Italy is not at all possible. The author contends that it was all made up to get people excited while reading. He feels that he might have bribed the officials. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that the other prisoners had better friends who had political influence when compared to Chevelier but they couldn't be released. He notes that the old venetian documents had a record where it is mentioned that a sealing was done to the Chevelier's prison after he escaped.
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor s record of treating similarly afflicted patients Through gaining such access the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition 58
- The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area Although only a small percentage of the land wi 59
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 70
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 60
- Chevaleir memoir 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s about why the memoir is not accurate. The lecturer disputes the argument made in ...
^^^
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he lecturer. He claims that taking loan doesnt mean that a person is poor. Additionall...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'points'.
Suggestion: points
...that a person is poor. Additionally, he point out that Chevelier had a lot of assets ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
... bribed the officials. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that the other prisoners had ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 392, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...nce when compared to Chevelier but they couldnt be released. He notes that the old vene...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78260869565 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54650052886 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531055900621 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4176956457 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0526315789 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0709962065345 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320893672583 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636374810504 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643410072192 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851356358663 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.