The table below shows the number of visitors in the UK and their average spending from 2003 to 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the number of visitors in the UK and the amount of money they spent between 2003 and 2008.
Overall, the average spending per visit followed an upward trend over the period shown. Also, the number of visits was the highest in 2007 of the six years.
In 2002, the figure for visits was 234. 715 million with their total spending was 11. 855 billion euros. In the next 5 years, the number of visitors in the UK showed a gradual increase to almost 33. 000 million then the figure for that slightly decreased to 31. 888 million. Meanwhile, the figure for the latter witnessed an increase of about 5. 000 billion euros in 2006 then dropped to 15. 960 billion euros in the next year after rising back to 16. 323 billion euros at the end of the period.
Turning to the other categories, initiating at 475 euros in 2003, the average spending per visit increased steadily to 511 euros over the next 5 years. In the meantime, the average nights per visit remained unchangeable at 8. 2 in 2003 and 2004 then rose slowly to 8. 4 in 2006 before experiencing a gentle decline of 0. 7.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-21 | myduyen282 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | lucluc | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-26 | Han Duyen | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-04 | immtee | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The line graphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 73
- The diagram shows how the horse evolved through time with particular emphasis on its foot structure 78
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years 55
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48258706468 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32769901797 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1369184343 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 56.3125 112.824112599 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.5625 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.3125 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151345805286 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440165235962 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637877488788 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113916605259 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682052056395 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.0 13.2329268293 45% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.14 61.2550243902 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.3 10.3012195122 32% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.82 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.