The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age.
The illustration depicts the tool for cutting from the Stone Age in two different period including tool A from 1.4 million years ago and tool B from 0.8 million years ago.
Overall, it is noticeable that both tools share similar shape, however, an innovation in manufacturing these tools is observed as tool B is considered to be more advanced and complex than tool A.
From 1.4 million years ago, Stone Age tools has triangle structure with a length of approximately 7 cm from both front and back view, which had a blunt head to go hunting or cut food on purpose. Therefore, it indicated basic tool making technique at that period as it retained all the characteristic of a natural rock with a rough surface from both view.
However, tool B represented the advancement in the manufacturing process. It was relatively larger in size with a sharpened tip and edges, which viewed from front and back. Also, as it had water-drop shape with a round bottom which was completely fit the user’s hand. The special features was the thin level of tool was increased to escalate the job performance
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 81
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tool' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tools'.
Suggestion: tools
...e Age in two different period including tool A from 1.4 million years ago and tool B...
^^^^
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...n two different period including tool A from 1.4 million years ago and tool B from 0...
^^^^
Line 6, column 93, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: larger
...anufacturing process. It was relatively larger in size with a sharpened tip and edges, which v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81481481481 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7957944317 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608465608466 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7050251579 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201646266103 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861630651081 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728329286459 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135375473557 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584091080424 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.