In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In different nations, people develop more tendency to travel to out-of-town stores for goods, which cause detrimental impact on the business of small local shops. Consequently, individuals not possessing personal vehicles find it challenging to access these location and a growth in the use of cars is witnessed. Personally judging, its benefits overshadow the drawbacks as the nation economy could develop sustainable through the purchasing activities.
This development has two primary positive effects. Specifically, the expansion of suburb stores helps to foster goods’ production and boosts the commercial activities as these stores possess a wide range of goods and products, which plays as a key factor to attract customers. Also, as the out-of-town shops expand in size, their sales escalation boosts the goods consumption which have positive influence on the nation economy.
Nevertheless, mentioned about the negative aspects, this change also have detrimental impact on the environment. In detail, not possessing a car cause difficulty for individuals who want to purchase at these stores. Therefore, this phenomenon can only be addressed by the reliance on the shipping services which account for the large amount of carbon footprint for each purchase. Also, as people have to drive for a long distance to reach these locations, it not only escalates the greenhouse effect but also causes severe traffic congestion.
Personally, I endorse that the positive effects outperform the negative as environmental problems can be tackled by encourage people to use public transport. Besides, boosting commercial activities can be regarded as a long-term benefits for the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | NHU95 | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 84
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accessing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accessing
...g personal vehicles find it challenging to access these location and a growth in the use ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this location' or 'these locations'?
Suggestion: this location; these locations
... vehicles find it challenging to access these location and a growth in the use of cars is witn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...size, their sales escalation boosts the goods consumption which have positive influen...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
...tivities can be regarded as a long-term benefits for the nation.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, nevertheless, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67716535433 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03633931548 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622047244094 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7216442671 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179376952298 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594523575874 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667437611209 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10381983205 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598353858972 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.