In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It would be argued by some that it is essential to expenditure much money on building new high-speed rail networks between other cities. In my opinion, however, they should pour money into improving current public transport.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some believe that the government should invest to construct new bullet trains. The first reason is saving a large amount of time. People of today live far from the city centers because of the cost of accommodation. Thus, Fast transport could citizens more travel to centers. Another reason is contributing money to the social economy. This is because high-speed rail allows people to travel at much lower prices than flights and in a faster time than traditional trains. Such fast, inexpensive travel could encourage citizens more visit other cities.
On the other hand, I would argue that upgrading existing public transport is more important. Unlike high-speed trains, that connect cities, public transport enables people to travel within the city. Private vehicles are more comfortable, but they cause a great deal of pollution. A lot of people have recognized this and want to reduce air pollution. If the government invests to upgrade public transport systems that already exist, more and more people will want to use it. For instance, they can add more public transport routes to more areas in the cities.
In conclusion, although some people think that it is important to spend a lot of money on high-speed rail. In my opinion, however, they should enhance current public transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 84
- The table below shows the percentages of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11673151751 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59010142938 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552529182879 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4397205645 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.3529411765 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1176470588 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274845250914 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874589856594 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547284389667 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183827605409 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465091929687 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.