We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Problems exist all over the globe. It is believed by some that since helping every needy person in the world is practically impossible, one should concentrate on assisting the needs of locals. I do not completely agree with the statement because I think sending help to those who need urgent assistance, even though they are foreign, is important to save humanity.
To begin with, it is crucial for developed countries to help developing countries who are facing economic crisis and instability in their nations. Since such third-war nations cannot support themselves financially, if powerful nations do not lend a helping hand, they will not be able to survive on their own. Secondly, poor countries depend on powerful nations to supply healthcare products, such as medicines and medical equipments. Were powerful nations to stop their subsidies, the conditions of the citizenry of impoverished nations will deteriorate further. Lastly, nations helping each other through international charity is a symbol of unity and integrity. Humans should collectively take initiatives to ameliorate each others dire situations, irrespective of the geography is the most humane thing to do.
Having said this, those who contend that we cannot send help to everyone and we must focus on native countries, mainly say so because they feel the health of local people will determine the progress of nation. Only by helping the local residents first can the country achieve economic prosperity and social progression. However, they fail to see the bigger picture that all nations in the world are inter-connected. If one nation is suffering, it may take down others with them. For instance, if medicines against common diseases are not donated to poverty-sickened nations, diseases may spread nationwide and may even run rampant worldwide, putting the lives of all inhabitats on the planet in danger.
In conclusion, although some people oppose the idea of catering to the needs of other nations, it is wise to help those who cannot help themselves. In my opinion, strong nations should help impoverished nations as much as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-25 | Caroline Nguyễn | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-10 | RamInd | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-24 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-25 | Cuberates | 89 | view |
| 2017-11-05 | Rahi | 87 | view |
- You play a team sport with some friends Last week a member of the team had an accident and wasn t able to play with you over the the weekend You decide to write to him at the hospital telling him about the match Write a letter to your friend In your lette 73
- Social media enable people to keep in touch with each other and learn about news events Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 83
- Analysts tell us that many people today feel stressed and think they have insufficient control over their lives What problems do such feelings cause for people What remedies could you suggest 84
- Nowadays the differences between countries are becoming less evident because we see the same TV shows advertisements fashion and follow the same brands To what extent the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages 11
- Some think increasing business and cultural contact between nations is positive Others think it leads to the disappearance of the national identity Discuss both views and state your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...crucial for developed countries to help developing countries who are facing economic crisi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, third, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31454005935 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90751827701 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581602373887 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6233932897 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.9375 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277241961166 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815627282005 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618720925625 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169103810418 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248116608755 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.