The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2002, and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of the total world population in 4 nations from 1950 to 2050.
Overall, India world population increased slightly while the USA population reduced sharply and will remain in the future while the total population in China and Japan reduced dramatically.
First of all, there was 15% of Idia total population in 1950 before rising to 17% in 2002 and this figure will rise to nearly 20% in 2050. Secondly, the number of China people took the highest proportion of the total population, which held nearly 25% in 1950 then there was a slow decrease in this percentage to 20% in the next 52 years later. Moreover, It is predicted that the figure of the world population in China will continue to fall significantly to 15% in 2050.
On the other hand, the percentage of world population in the USA declined to 5% and will remain stable this percentage until 2050. Finally, Japan took the lowest proportion of world population, which just about under 5% in 1950. However, Japan witnessed a huge change in their total world population, which fell enormously to 3% in 2002 but this figure still decrease to 2% in the next 42 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | Alena.222 | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-13 | mrinal | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | buiminhduc | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-25 | trangtb2k5 | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | Sangita Neupane | 56 | view |
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 56
- In some countries the number of shootings increases because many people have guns at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 61
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below gives information about UK Immigration Emigration and net migration between 1999 to 2008
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, still, then, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78217821782 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61811460144 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485148514851 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4657373434 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.125 5.23603664747 270% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246374984375 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131572593826 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874513782301 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190582083901 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935784251741 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.