Some people think that with the development of advanced technologies such as AI, virtual teachers, students can learn online with personalized learning models while keeping peer support and group discussion as traditional education. Some others believe that only traditional education can provide such things. Which opinion do you agree with and why? Include details and examples to support your idea.
A lot of people opine that pupils can study online with customized learning models for specific people while remaining in discussion with teams and keeping co-equal partners' assistance thanks to the evolution of progressive technologies, for example, AI or virtual tutors. In contrast, others consider that only face-to-face classes can supply these things. I totally concur with the second opinion.
Firstly, traditional education helps youths in maintaining their discipline, manners, and morals. For instance, adolescents have to wake up early, have breakfast, and get ready for school in the morning, otherwise, they will be punished, so they form for themselves a healthy and positive daily routine. Moreover, teacher-student relationships can be best set up at schools. Questions and problems of pupils can be shown directly, thus coaches and learners may solve them together. And there are other advantages of traditional tutoring that a teacher can monitor the body language of the students and ensure their focus.
Furthermore, not everyone can access online classes. A harsh reality is in remote areas, a lot of schoolgirls or schoolboys do not have smartphones or computers, and it is impossible for them to study online day-to-day. Besides, online teaching is a good platform, however, it causes various health problems, such as eyes or back issues. According to a Havard university report, approximately 45% of students have eye issues, such as myopic or long-sighted. So if students continue looking at the screen for a long duration, this problem will be worse.
In conclusion, it is transparent that face-to-face education brings much more benefit to scholars than online tutoring.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49809885932 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05895840168 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661596958175 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0876640325 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228701217528 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691255773121 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066633045097 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124217399779 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888137880606 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49809885932 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05895840168 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661596958175 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0876640325 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228701217528 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691255773121 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066633045097 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124217399779 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888137880606 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.