The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture illustrates the four evolutionary phases of the horse over the period of 40 years. Overall, it is apparent that the modern horse is significantly bigger than its ancestors and there is the gradual disappearance of its toes.
The initial horse was examined to live 40 million years ago and named Eohippus, and this is also considered to have the smallest size among four stages. In the comparison with the first phase, Mesohippus, which was found 10 million years later, shows some semblance of a mane. Circa 15 million years ago, the Merychippus appeared, and at this prehistoric stage, it largely resembled the modern horse. Eventually, the horse today gets taller with a fully formed mane on the neck.
The foot structure exhibits remarkable changes as well. The foot of the initial species was slender with five distinct digits. Compared with the earliest stage, Eohippus and Mesohippus had fewer toes, only three and the latter horse shows a more prominent middle digit. Finally, the latest species has sole hoof and developed joints.
- The graph shows the amount of fossil fuel energy generated in Europe between 1981 and 2001 78
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight How far do you agree with either of these views 67
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09826589595 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58307136496 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658959537572 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3989825431 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182358194521 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638608436072 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526608610515 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111347318684 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437870666736 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.