some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. other thinks access to much information creates problems.
Controversy exists whether the internet is beneficial for people or not. As far as I am concerned, access to the internet provides valuable information and there are more advantages in it because not only the internet makes lives easier but also, helps environments to expand. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint my case.
The first reason worth mentioning is that the life of students got easier by the use of the internet. In modern societies, many aspects of people's lives have been altered by the advancement of technology. Internet is a unique change that changes people's lifestyles. In the past, students were obliged to study their sources from books. Since the price of buying a book was high for students, they must go to libraries. Libraries were crowded all the time and types of books that have lower copy numbers were occupied for a long time which waste students' time. However, with the development of technology, electronic books were invented. These kinds of books have the same information were presented in them. Moreover, the number of electronic books is not limited and every person can purchase without need to worry about it. Therefore, much more information is available for students to study and broaden their knowledge.
A furthur more subtle point is that the internet is beneficial for the environment and it prevents its destruction. It presents a lot of information without the need for books. Furthermore, the process of publishing books is not required anymore. As everyone knows, for publishing a book, trees from the forest should be cut, and paper is a product of trees. Trees are essential for the environment and their purpose is to refine the weather by exchanging carbon dioxide to oxygen. Therefore, with the emergence of online books which can be read on computers or mobiles, there is no need to cut trees down. For instance, newspapers were very popular in the past. It provides a broad range of information. With the advancement of technology, the internet was developed, and every website focuses on a specific kind of news that was more interesting for audiences.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, the internet presented a lot of valuable information that is crucial for people due to making people's lifestyles much better and easier and saving trees from destruction.
- TPO 13 80
- Agree or disagree:extended family is less important now than it was in the past. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 66
- TPO42 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07435897436 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84759145952 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520512820513 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2364442302 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0434782609 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9565217391 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91304347826 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216278910915 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602579095967 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708007270638 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169109801171 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748181699201 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.