Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of student's project engendered copious controversies among people. Some people incline toward the opinion is that it is more beneficial for students to work together on homework. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that it is vital and crucial to work alone on projects. At my vantage point, when teachers assign projects, it is necessary for juvenile since they obtain plentiful information. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
A further more subtle point is that students extend their knowledge by work with their classmates. Students can share and exchange their knowledge with each other when students create a group. For instance, the group of students who work on a project expresses their idea and solution precisely and by this way, they can learn more effectively. Moreover, they can help each other while they are working in a group. many students have a weakness in a special area and by working in a group, they can help each other to improve and enhance their knowledge in that area. For instance, a person who has not a great background in math when work with an expert in the mathematical area get motivated and inspired to learn more and reinforce and boost his weakness.
The second significant point supporting my idea is that in a group students have time to solve their problem. A team of students are going to share their work among themselves and can submit their project before the deadline pass and after that can help other members to solve their problem. But, when a student works alone on a project, it is an arduous task for him because of his lack of time he cannot solve his questions. For example, a student who works alone on a difficult project can end it near the deadline time. If he tries to solve his problems, he cannot present his project at a deadline time. Hence, he has to skip his problem and only try to finish his project.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned arguments, students by working in groups can exchange and improve their knowledge and solve their problem. Consequently, it is highly recommended that teachers make a restrict role and force students work in groups. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but is not embraced due to the dearth of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 415, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...ther while they are working in a group. many students have a weakness in a special a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...t supporting my idea is that in a group students have time to solve their problem. A tea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s highly recommended that teachers make a restrict role and force students work in groups....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85401459854 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65786326371 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479318734793 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0396827247 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.55 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310353683264 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108046775741 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513020014766 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200615507684 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401973072837 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.