The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The bar graph illustrates the percentage of the global population and global wealth in 8 different regions.
Overall, China is the nation that has the highest proportion of the global population while North America is the region, which takes the highest percentage of the global wealth.
First of all, China population holds nearly 25% in the global population. Secondly, other Asia pacific, India and Europe are three regions that have the same number of the figure for the global population, which about more and less than 15%. Moreover, this figure is followed by Africa, which is just about 10%. In addition, Latin America and Caribbean, and North America global population occur higher than 5% while only rich Asia Pacific has the lowest proportion to 5%.
On the other hand, North America region places the first rank of the global wealth by nearly 35%. Furthermore, this figure is followed by Europe and rich Asia Pacific to 30% and 24% respectively. Finally, the global wealth percentage in China, other Asia Pacific, India, Africa and Latin American and Caribbean is lower than 5% at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-28 | mytinh | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-17 | buiminhduc | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-26 | Surbhi96 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | Trangdodo | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | Samathanary | 78 | view |
- The chart compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001 61
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 78
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010
- After leaving school or university young people should choose a job or career that they love rather than one that pays the best salary To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and repo 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, while, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04891304348 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45944780522 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505434782609 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3100998551 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4444444444 5.23603664747 238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157879887544 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769845750529 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486791141644 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124365555158 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289981535522 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, while, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04891304348 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45944780522 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505434782609 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3100998551 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4444444444 5.23603664747 238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157879887544 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769845750529 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486791141644 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124365555158 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289981535522 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.