Some people could be naturally good leaders. Others believe that people can learn leadership skills. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued that leadership is a blessing given at birth, while others believe that it can be developed through practicing. From my perspective, being a leader requires particular traits, many are innate and few are enhanced thanks to learning.
On the one hand, there are a broad range of explanations why a massive proportion of proponents support the idea of natural leaders. In fact, various studies have pointed out that this characteristic is based on the genetic field. For instance, for such people like Bill Gates, he dropped out of school, even he did not enroll in higher education, however, he still became an owner of a successful organization with thousands of employees - Microsoft. He ran the company to become one of the most well-known organization related to information technology over the world, and this particular trait is also believed to be innate.
On the other hand, many suppose that leadership skills can be learnt through one’s up-bringing. To begin with, being a leader acquires numerous qualities such as discipline, resourcefulness, charisma, passion and energy so if directors or managers want their employees to abide by their instructions, they should expert in their sector. Furthermore, if the leaders do not take part in any intensive training courses or workshops to boost the experience, they will make inappropriate decisions and lack persuasion, which will demotivate the staff in the workplace. Thus, the credibility will be reduced greatly if the heads stop learning.
In conclusion, I believe that becoming powerful leaders need both genes and cultivating unceasingly. There are many people born without natural leadership skills that can still become good leaders in the future.
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 67
- People living in big cities face several problems What are these problems What can be done by governments to solve these problems 82
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 aand 2008 73
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 63
- In many large cities in the world the quality of life is decreasing What are the reasons for this Suggest some possible solutions 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34671532847 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0277482564 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649635036496 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0239846693 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.083333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244629253644 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878254686847 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879662586698 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158928707345 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901945361218 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.