Nowaday, an increasing number of film makers take part in the film producing and there are many movies for us to choose. In my opinion, I would like to choose a movie depending on its evaluation among the people for the following reasons. These estimations from other people help me watch it objectively, efficiently, and seriously.
First of all, negative information is what we probably won't watch if we want a nice experience, which means we need to learn about the quality of the film quickly. A positive movie should have its own creative plot and meaningful ideas rather than merely copy. It won't be worth the time for watching thousands of negative moives because we can hardly absorb knowledge immersing in the useless information. For example, if the public comments are all showing bad attitudes and give a low rank to a movie, which probably means it's a work for only marketing. To better make use of our time and sharp our understand to the movie industry, we might want to pay much attention to the other people saying about it.
What's more, referring the opinions of other people is a better way to understand the ideas behind the movie. As an old saying goes: you have an idea, I have an idea, swapping the ideas makes us have two different ideas. It's more or less limitted to view the work from one angle. Therefore, the public opinion are another important references in order to find out the deeper understanding of the topic. For example, in the public comment area we may see those who have reviewed a certain kind of movie serval times and leave an excellent comment or recommondation. Thus, other opinions play important role in the choosing.
Finally, we could view a work more seriously if we have those evaluations as the previous knowledge. Some emotional comment toward a movie may not be accurary or even fake, which can't provide the objective information for us. However, the benefit of referring the other opinions outweighs the disadvantage. It's critical for the people in their first time to choose what films to watch because it's the rapid pace of life allow less time for us to classify the quality. Therefore, we gradually feel an urgent need to form our serious idea toward the movie by ourselves.
- You have a choice of movies to see What influences you the most in choosing which movie to see 76
- Your teacher has given you a large assignment that must be completed in one month You can complete the assignment gradually by working on it a little bit each day or you can complete the work quickly by working on it intensively for three or four days Whi 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...w rank to a movie, which probably means its a work for only marketing. To better ma...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...to the other people saying about it. Whats more, referring the opinions of other p...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...may not be accurary or even fake, which cant provide the objective information for u...
^^^^
Line 7, column 394, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...e to choose what films to watch because its the rapid pace of life allow less time ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, kind of, first of all, in my opinion, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78092783505 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62361892977 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546391752577 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7030893223 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6315789474 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173415966313 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479491112472 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434270206453 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106741442046 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219696962342 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.