People are having more and more sugar-based drinks.
What are the reasons? What can be done to make people drink less?
The level of carbonated beverage consumption has surged recently. The main culprits behind this phenomenon are mostly addictive ingredients as well as inexpensive prices, and the possible solutions could be more stringent governmental regulations in tandem with news dissemination.
The unprecedented rate of soft drink consumption can be blamed for soda addition and their affordable costs. To begin with, these sparkling beverages often contain multiple stimulants such as caffeine, sugar and artificial sweeteners which have been proved to be extremely addictive if drinks consume them on a daily basis. Many people have an uphill struggle to live without seltzer for only one day, showing the total dependency on such sweetened drinks. Usually, addicts consume an average of 2 soda cans for each meal. Over time, their addiction climbs up, continually urging them to drink for more satisfaction, which undermines their general health quickly. The other catalyst for this threatening tendency is that sugary beverages are sold at sensible prices. This is because companies mass-produce products to guarantee that they could be purchased by any individuals from different economic backgrounds. Fresh water and mineral water, in contrast, are healthy yet at comparatively higher prices; therefore, they are unlikely to be selected rather than the carbonated drinks on the same supermarket counters.
The matter could be curbed by both legislators and the mass media. Firstly, it is a good idea that the government imposes heavy taxes on sweet beverages. As a result, there would be a rise in the retail prices if these drinks are attached to the tax increase. Japan is the pioneering country to have taken that action when introducing additional charges for sugar-based drinks to prevent the public from health risk issues. Consumers’ behavior, thanks to this policy, has changed swiftly, aiming for more vegetable or fruit drinks. Finally, the media also has a role to play in adjusting the customers’ habits. By broadcasting the information as regards physical problems owing to excessive use of soda, the media could step by step makes buyers understand potential risks and switch to healthier options, creating a gradual drop in the rate of soda purchase.
In summary, seltzer waters are enormously consumed for the two main reasons: habit-forming ingredients and reasonable prices. Where possible, an introduction of high taxation and social media dissemination should be promulgated to contain this threat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | phamkhuyen | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | EmilyLogan | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | Thu ne | 95 | view |
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a frog Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ns in tandem with news dissemination. The unprecedented rate of soft drink consum...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, as regards, in contrast, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50257731959 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95362511465 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646907216495 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4506270224 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.368421053 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207594059207 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525683915666 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424986109446 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10314178122 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563541100233 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.