The pie charts show the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given pie charts illustrate the revenue and spending percentages of a children’s charity in the United States in the year 2016.
Overall, it is apparent that the charity benefited most from food donation, and they spent a huge amount of money on program services. In addition, the money for the expenditures were generally lower than that of the revenue sources.
As for the first pie chat, donated food accounted for over two-thirds of the total revenue as the most primary source. The second largest proportion came from community contributions, with 10.4%. The other sources only took small percentages of the sources. Program povouo took approximately 2.2%, while investment income and government grants had the same proportions at 0.2%. Other income occupied the rest portion of the pie chart, at 0.4%.
Moving to the second pie chart, program services accounted the most substantial proportion which made up nearly the whole expenditures, with 95.8%. The other elements were insignificant, with fundraising at 2.6%, and management and general at 1.6% as the lowest percentage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-09 | nemcutehotme | view | |
| 2022-02-04 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | TUAN MINH | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | Sanaullah97 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-14 | asmita acharya | 87 | view |
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 90
- The diagram below shows how oil is extracted in the production of perfume Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to providing formal education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The table below shows the population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34682080925 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87742854674 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5465734054 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129117006573 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508585240146 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623717129997 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966586272465 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663711991789 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.