ane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she looked like. For a long time, the only accepted image of Austen was an amateur sketch of an adult Austen made by her sister Cassandra. However recently a professionally painted, full-length portrait of a teenage girl owned by a member of the Austen family has come up for sale. Although the professional painting is not titled Jane Austen, there are good reasons to believe she is the subject.
First, in 1882, several decades after Austen's death, Austen's family gave permission to use the portrait as an illustration in an edition of her letters. Austen's family clearly recognized it as a portrait of the author. So, for over a century now, the Austen family itself has endorsed the claim that the girl in the portrait is Jane Austen.
Second, the face in the portrait clearly resembles the one in Cassandra's sketch, which we know depicts Austen. Though somewhat amateurish, the sketch communicates definite details about Austen's face. Even though the Cassandra sketch is of an adult Jane Austen, the features are still similar to those of the teenage girl in the painting. The eyebrows, nose, mouth, and overall shape of the face are very much like those in the full-length portrait.
Third, although the painting is unsigned and undated, there is evidence that it was painted when Austen was a teenager. The style links it to Ozias Humphrey, a society portrait painter who was the kind of professional the wealthy Austen family would hire. Humphrey was active in the late 1780s and early 1790s, exactly the period when Jane Austen was the age of the girl in the painting.
Both reading passage and lecture discusses whether the portrait of teenage girl painted recently by professional is real resemblance of famous novelist Jane Austen. The former argues that there are three reasons to believe the image is of real Austen, but the latter contradicts each of these points.
First of all, the author of the passage claims that Austen family assured the portrait to be use for her letters which confirms her actual image. However, the lecturer contends this claim and says that the letters authorized by Austen's family is when she was dead for 74 years .He goes to states that no one from her family actually saw her in their life which doubts the argument in reading passage.
Secondly, the writer represents that details in portrait matches the feature of the sketch of Austen in Cassandra's portrait. Nonetheless the listening counters that feature in the sketch can be of any relative in the family. Furthermore, he believes that Jane's family was large and there are many teenagers in the family , it is possible that features like mentioned in reading can be matched to anyone in the family.
At last, the text asserts that painting is believed to be the styles of Ozias Humphrey which was well known active painter when Austen was young and believed to be hire by her wealthy family. In contrast, speaker rebuts this theory by saying that stamp found on portrait has blank canvas which was painted by William Leg. He states that these painting by painter Leg was sold in London when Austen was around 27 years old , way older than what is shown in painting.
In conclusion, we can see both writer and lecturer hold different view on the topic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-27 | Yam Kumar Oli | 65 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | stupidfella | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | 1ms19ec133 | 82 | view |
| 2022-06-15 | Hello GRE | 45 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 66
- Summarize 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 76
- The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago it caused much concern because sea otte 76
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...family is when she was dead for 74 years .He goes to states that no one from her f...
^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...mily is when she was dead for 74 years .He goes to states that no one from her fam...
^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...ketch of Austen in Cassandras portrait. Nonetheless the listening counters that feature in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d there are many teenagers in the family , it is possible that features like menti...
^^
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ndon when Austen was around 27 years old , way older than what is shown in paintin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82986111111 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37122313747 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565972222222 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.5480855709 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.454545455 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7272727273 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110115286521 0.272083759551 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426304206728 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334556610703 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0579314948435 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320462200553 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.