The maps give information about a university sports court.
The process compares the layout of a university sports court in 1990 and at present. Overall, the court has been expanded and there is a new introduction and reconstruction of some facilities.
Starting with 1990, there was a park in the top-left corner of the map and under it was a car park. An outdoor swimming pool was located in the opposite side of the park and next to it were a café and a reception. There was a changing room under the reception and behind it was a tennis court.
Moving to the court at present. The most striking change is that the park has been cut down to make way for a basketball court. Moreover, the previous place of a car park was replaced by a tennis court while the café and the reception were remained unchanged during the given period. Another notable different is that the outdoor pool in the top- right corner of the map has been reconstructed to an indoor one and the changing room was expanded. Finally, the former place of the tennis court was transformed into a fitness center now.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | lalo | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-14 | Feresew | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | thuphuong2302 | view |
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news by age group 2011 78
- The maps give information about a university sports court 61
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 2000 Summaries the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51336898396 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56538505723 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497326203209 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8196873242 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154407003329 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734504213642 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059423453211 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124948725073 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643530509311 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51336898396 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56538505723 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497326203209 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8196873242 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154407003329 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734504213642 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059423453211 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124948725073 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643530509311 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.