The bar chart shows the percentage of small , medium, large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016.
The bar chart compares the proportion of three different types of companies that maintained a presence of social media in a four year period starting from 2012. Overall, the first rank in terms of using belonged to large business and both types of them make the most extensive use in 2016.
Starting with 2012, 2013 and 2014. The percentage of using social media in large business in 2012 was nearly 80% which was the highest, in comparison to about 28% in the small one, and slightly over 30% in the medium. After two year, a slight upward trend to 35% and 50% was seen in the proportion of small and medium companies, respectively whereas that for the other was mostly unchanged.
Regarding to two remained years. 2015 witnessed a significant declined in both types of business, while the percentage of the small and medium were equal at 30%, that for the large one was nearly around 52%. This rising trend would then resume in the final year, resulting in the recovery to around 50% in 2016 for both.
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- The maps give information about a university sports court 67
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 100
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The bar chart compares the proportion of three different types of companies that ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66292134831 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3862057818 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2929696822 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360623588648 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129634287374 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948255277128 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225491967807 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605893356004 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.