(Cambridge 15 - Test 1 - Task 1) The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The represented bar chart provides information about how citizens in five different cities in Australia
spend money on coffee and tea. Citizens are divided into three categories of drinking habits in the last
four week, data are measured in percentage of residents.
Generally speaking, it is noticeable that people in all five cities prefered going to a café the most, and
they enjoyed buying fresh coffee the least.
To begin with Sydney, it is worth noting that over 60% of city's citizens chose to go to a cafe, while the
percentages of people buying fresh coffee or instant coffee were at approximately 45%. There are the
same patterns in Melbourne and Hobart where almost 65% of their residents went to a café in the last
four weeks.
Moreover, there is a slight different trend in Adelaide where the percentage of locals buying instant
coffee was higher than any other groups. The data also shows that there are not many people in
Bristane and Adelaide bought fresh coffee, only just under 35%, roughly 15% less than the
percentage of citizens buying instant coffee in both city
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Write and Improve 67
- Cambridge 15 Test 1 Task 1 The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 78
- The line graph illustrates of the people aged 65 and over from 1940 to 2040 in three Sweden Japan and USA countries
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Write and Improve 84
- The graph below shows the proportion the population aged 65 and over between 190 and 2040 in three different countries
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98918918919 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43437760062 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.164965935 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257684487876 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112843137365 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680222631577 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088160869237 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060092513278 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.