In the modernizing society, the youngsters often wonder whether they should go for tertiary education or not after graduating from high school. Many people advocate that continuing to study at a higher level is the shortest way to have a satisfied job, whereas others suppose working right after graduation is much better. From my perspective, I agree with both statements.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why people hold an opinion that it is better for students to pursue higher education. Firstly, having formal qualification equips students with adequate knowledge and widens their educational horizons as well. This will not only be advantageous for future jobs but also be qualified for jobs position. For instance, teachers, doctors or engineers all need to have a university degree and certain knowledge to be able to work in these jobs. Moreover, academic qualifications are required when applicants apply for a new job. This helps to get more employment opportunities and candidates can earn higher salaries in such competitive market.
On the other hand, there are also some advantages of working right after graduating from high school. Firstly, starting to earn money early in life encourages young people to obtain a lot of real experiences and master vital soft skills. Youngsters will be more mature and independent, afford their own living standard and reduce the financial burden of their family. Another important benefit is that getting a job early can widen a circle of relationships, people will support each other in various situations, which leads to positive effects in later career.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that both working right after school or choosing to continue higher study are all advantageous in their own ways. I honestly hope that students can chose either way, depending on their situation.
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 78
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 73
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, honestly, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34113712375 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85836781255 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635451505017 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6726432163 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.466666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171201854312 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538688002095 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482870088471 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104949095593 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349148170817 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.