The provided graphs demonstrate the Australian people going to the movies in all age groups and average number of cinema visits by four distinct age groups between 1996 and 2000.
Overall, it is obvious that the percentage of cinema attendants tent to increase remarkably while there was a gradual downward trend in the frequency. Besides, the average cinema visits according to age groups witnessed oscillation during the period.
In 1996, the rate of people going to cinema made up 62%, then grew by 10% in the next year and stayed constant at the same figure until 2000 despite a slight drop to 70% from 1998 to 1999. On the contrary, there were 10,3 average visitors to the movies at the beginning, followed by a marginal growth to 11,1 visits in 1997 and then declined dramatically to 8,3 and 8,2 in the next 3 years.
In 1996, people aged 14-24 visited cinema 15 times on average while 10 was the figure of the oldest age group. There were about 12 and 14 visits of the age group 25-35 and 35-49, respectively. In 1997, the number of all age groups underwent a noticeable upward trend by 8 times but then fell to the same figure as the beginning. Over the last 2 years, the numbers fluctuated and eventually rose to nearly 18, 17, 15 and 14 visits.
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries people now wear western style dress such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and inclu 78
- The table show the average salaries of graduates and non graduates in the UK in 2010 Summarise information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61777777778 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45792645723 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0215240099 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273401804279 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121790563963 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901768791387 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186521170869 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650200247861 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61777777778 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45792645723 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0215240099 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273401804279 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121790563963 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901768791387 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186521170869 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650200247861 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.