The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011
A glance at the line graph reveals the Food Price Index and Average Oil Prices over a period of 11 years.
It is evident that the prices of both commodities climbed considerably between 2000 and 2011. Moreover, the trend for prices of both oil and food were immensely similar, with a strong correlation (93. 6%) is suggested.
In the year 2000, the food price was relatively close to the average price of oil, at 90 points and $25 per barrel. Over the following 4 years, both prices remained stable, before growing dramatically between 2004 and 2007. In 2007, the average food price had more than doubled to nearly $60 per barrel, and food prices had risen by around 50 points.
A remarkable increase in both goods was seen from 2007 to 2008 obviously, with the food price index reaching a peak of 230 points and average oil price rising to approximately $120 per barrel. However, by the beginning of 2009, the price of both commodities had dropped rapidly by $90 for average food price and roughly 80 points for the food price index. At long last, in 2011, the average food price index reached its peak of, at almost 240 points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-24 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports for younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Topic Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Why is this happening Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the drawbacks 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much Why do people take part in dangerous sports Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers 73
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59701492537 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41429412426 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0582164052 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319538209367 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150359979352 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071237208976 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231547090128 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204687293776 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.