Some people argue that it is the government's responsibility to transport children to school, while others believe parents should do that. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this contemporary epok, a handful of individuals think that authorities should take responsibility to transport pupils to school instead of care takers. Personally, I deem that parents should do that and couple of views are discussed in forthcoming paragraphs.
Commencing with statement, there are several benefits if regime take that responsibility of children. First and foremost, children become superior. To be more precice, most of children crying when their parents transport them to school to strong bonds. Whereas, they always think about their parents when they come and take them. Due to which, they are unable to focus on study and get less marks in their exams. If government take responsibility to transport pupils to school thus children only focus on their academics instead of distract thoughts regarding parents. Hence, pupil become superior related to studies and career. Apart from this, parents also spend quality of time together rather than worrying about children.
However, care takers also have some responsibilities related to transport of children to school. Firstly, it leads to strong bond if parents take that responsibility. Parents also become aware about the study of children and their academics marks. Moreover, parents would know about their communication skills of their pupil as how they communicate with their companions and peers. To epitome, in America, majority of parents take that responsibility or they know about the score of children on their daily basis tasks. Therefore, they may teach their children in right manner.
To recapitulate, although there are few merits if law makers take that responsibility viz pupil focus on study and parents spend some time together. Yet, I personally consider that parents should do that because are known about weakness of their children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-23 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 67 | view |
- The chart and graph below gives information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of areas such as fashion and consumer goods To what extent do you agree 73
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 73
- Some companies have uniforms for their staff which must be worn at all times What are the advantages for a company having a uniform Are there any benefits of having a uniform for the staff 56
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the children') or simply say ''most children''.
Suggestion: most of the children; most children
...en become superior. To be more precice, most of children crying when their parents transport the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun marks is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ey are unable to focus on study and get less marks in their exams. If government tak...
^^^^
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tudy and get less marks in their exams. If government take responsibility to trans...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, whereas, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42456140351 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84734193759 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522807017544 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1262549261 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8888888889 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237103721736 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892130645301 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638465270415 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176367820013 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373609975326 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.