It is observed that in many countries, not enough students are choosing to study science subjects. What are the causes and effects of this situation?
It is irrefutable that the inadequacy of students pursuing science disciplines becomes a prevalent concern of many academics and educationalists in several part of the globe.
The fact that fewer students opts for science-related subjects may derive from two following reasons. Initially, the dull and demanding nature of scientific knowledge in general is to blame for the lack of interest among students. This means that whoever sticks to these subjects has to show great perseverance, long-term commitment, and ongoing dedication. Besides, many students are reluctant to take science-based majors as lectures may tend to deliver unbearably tedious lessons and they are required to conduct numerous scientific experiments and projects. Second, limited future employment opportunities could discourage students from enrolling in science-related faculties. Compared to graduates in economics, art and communication, those who major in science field are generally restricted to a certain number of jobs or positions.
The continuing decline of science enrolment rate might be responsible for a sheer number of adverse implications inflicting on society. The initial possible impact is a labor shortage in the realm of science. If there are less graduates qualified for science-based jobs, people can face the failure to meet the increasing demand of workforce in the fields such as manufacturing, technology and development. The second potential repercussion is that it will inhibit/impede the evolution of society owing to the fact that scientific achievements and advancements make enormous contribution to the improvement of human beings’ life quality.
All things considered, the monotonous and demanding essence of science- related subjects and poor job/career prospects are two primary reasons why students tend to take alternatives in other domains/for their majors, and this inclination can give rise to the dearth/scarcity of science human resources as well as hindering societal development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-23 | hieutrungpham7201 | 84 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 89
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university What are the advantages and disadvantages of this tendency 84
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university What are the advantages and disadvantages of this tendency 84
- In some countries more and more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university What are the advantages and disadvantages of this tendency 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun part seems to be countable; consider using: 'several parts'.
Suggestion: several parts
...f many academics and educationalists in several part of the globe. The fact that fewer stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun graduates is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e in the realm of science. If there are less graduates qualified for science-based j...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, second, so, well, as to, in general, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84641638225 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37634961861 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638225255973 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4422221867 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173057232852 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592936916917 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457147257416 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105958955651 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446385006922 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.