Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is frequently argued that pupils study far more with their teachers than other sources such as the internet or television. From my perspective, it can not be denied that students can learn a lot from the internet and TV set and these have become an indispensable part of education yet I believed that educators also have a crucial role in students' learning. And in this essay, I will demonstrate my point of view by analyzing the merits of studying with their schoolteachers and the sundry disadvantages of absorbing through the internet and tiny screen.

Firstly, it can not be denied that studying with teachers brings back multiple merits. Since people merely were tiny toddler at kindergartens until they become under-graduates, there are always schoolteachers who assist them to accumulate comprehension. Apparently, no one can learn by this method without teacher’s instruction as they are predecessors who have an in depth intelligence, they know how to learn effectively in the wake having experienced previously. Not only do they have academic experiences, but they also realize distinctive students' needs and capabilities to give the most effective methods of teaching them. Provide that apprentices solely educate themselves through online training, they will get trouble in digesting what they heard and saw as there is too much information to classify and select. As a result, without teachers, they impossibly make sense of when and how to start. In other words, teachers always manage to give intriguing and profound lessons to learners, which ensures that pupils learn from accurate and useful knowledge. If a pupil seems not to have an understanding, they will give a helping hand to him and together address obstacles. This is favorable for students now that not only they can learn added information but also do they obtain a number of practical solving-problem skills which is needed for their futures. What is more, when being taught by well-versed professors, trainers are likely to have a logical routine for studying. For instance, several idle graduates enthusiastically stated that they were thankful to their assistants on the grounds that they always reminded them of doing homework, supported meticulously, which made them more motivated and better. Hence, the productivity of their learning could be improved a lot.

Besides, educators can help undergraduates cultivate momentous soft skills besides studying. While attending face-to-face classes, juniors may interact with their tutors and classmates, which gives them a chance to develop their communication. To illustrate, if they have any questions or answers, they will boldly ask professors and dispute with friends to express their opinions. Moreover, assistants instruct learners how to become decent citizens. Pupils are taught moral lessons to behave well to others. Mentors also inspire them about the optimistic life and the route to overcome adversity. Therefore, scholars can step by step mature to enter life, which makes dons various from computers or televisions.

On the other hand, it is not frequently radical to have teacher’s guides, juniors can study themselves by another sources such as internet or privileged webs. The reason for it is that there are a huge number of documents on the Internet, which are contributed diversely by people entire the world including element scientist, experts and ones who have detailed knowledge. This can be a quite trustworthy authority to get them to figure out. The more excited pupils feel about it, the more they want to trace. It is also a way for them to help themselves become self-reliant. It is a part and parcel method being applied in almost universities, there, alumnus must elaborate lessons on the contrary have less announcement from lectures. The information absorbed directly is easily comprehended than tedious sermons in classes, besides, teaching full knowledge in class spends numerous time as scholars can give them basic, which is not enough for them to know inside. Subsequently, learning with lecturers is likely to render scholars more passive. As they merely look forward their supervisors, whenever they give any origin, teenagers take in it in dimly way. Actually, it is tough for them to be had ability to manage intricate and predicted issues.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, what is more, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 71.0 24.0651302605 295% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 41.998997996 202% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3646.0 1615.20841683 226% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 685.0 315.596192385 217% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32262773723 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11590702189 4.20363070211 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97660761123 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 354.0 176.041082164 201% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516788321168 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1127.7 506.74238477 223% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 16.0721442886 199% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7474687626 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.9375 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.40625 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 8.67935871743 265% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200369082835 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547535869936 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721648514749 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143565602005 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745540366202 0.056905535591 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 198.0 78.4519038076 252% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.