Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that traffic congestion and housing shortage could be tackled by relocating business offices and manufacturing plants to the rural areas. Personally, I would concede that the solution above is not viable to alleviate the situation but conversely engender constraints for the civilians.
For one thing, it is indisputable that with a massive number of workers in the cities, the transportation systems are often overflowing with passengers in public as well as commuters in private vehicles for traveling to the workplaces. By moving their workplaces to another spacious area, the traffic jam could be relieved directly as a result and help lessen the amount of industrial particulates which affect one’s physique negatively. Furthermore, previous space for offices and factories could be used for residential areas and other recreational purposes such as public parks which allows the dwellers to adopt a fitness regime.
For another, in fairness, the relocation of enterprise building will not be beneficial to the majority of the public given the geographical boundaries are the primary concern that prevent them from staying close with their families. Undoubtedly, the main factors of some when choosing careers is that the work environments have to meet both the income needs and reasonable distance to travel. Moving to the countryside is at the expense of more time and traffic fees are consumed, which is not an affordable option for the workers. Hence, from an educational perspective, children in which families have to move to such areas with their parents will receive inferior education in comparison with the advanced teaching methods in the cities which could potentially hamper their development in poor conditions.
To conclude, the suggestion of adjusting the workplace directions is not pragmatic to surmount the scarcity of housing and traffic problems. Yet, the authorities should adopt different measures to safeguard the rights of the general public and resolve the issues within the cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-26 | sonnn | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | mabel_yangyang | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-03 | Thien Trang | 68 | view |
- Many parents choose to teach their children at home instead of sending them to school Do you think the benefits of homeschooling outweigh its disadvantages 78
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...measures to safeguard the rights of the general public and resolve the issues within the citie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, hence, if, so, well, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46349206349 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96409351069 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596825396825 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.5796460301 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.454545455 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178871447739 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633929199419 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520729641813 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968273896949 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313727970898 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.