Social media, such as Facebook, Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century
Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages ?
It is quite common today that face-to-face contact is being replaced by several platforms, such as facebook, Twitter. In my opinion, this situation has surely carried along with it both merits and demerits.
Obvioously, social media offer several positive effects for online meeting. With the assistance of online platforms, people are available to interact with others easily since they do no need to worry about the distance or the time. In other words. users who want to have an online meeting just need a technology device which can connect with the internet. For instance, an American man only spend five minutes calling his friend,, who lives in Vietnam. He do not need to travel for a long distance to have a face-to-face meeting.
While there are certainly positive points to the issue, the inconveniences it has brought about shoul not be overlooked, One major problem is that people nowadays tend to spend more time on surfing the social platforms than meeting face-to-face with others. This can be proved by a research from a U.S University, which said that people in 2021 tended to spend 12 hours on the internet. There are several things, such as: video games, music, films which may be the factors that make people bother their real relationships. Another problem is that some rural areas have the low quality of internet, which do not allow them to interact with other ralatives, who love far from them.
In conclusion, social media does affect the contacts of people in many ways. However, I believe that the upsides of this development far outweight the drawbacks. Therefore, it should be widely promoted
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works Sumarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 84
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works Sumarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Users
...e distance or the time. In other words. users who want to have an online meeting just...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...ly spend five minutes calling his friend,, who lives in Vietnam. He do not need to...
^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...g his friend,, who lives in Vietnam. He do not need to travel for a long distance ...
^^
Line 6, column 281, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...face with others. This can be proved by a research from a U.S University, which said that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...is can be proved by a research from a U.S University, which said that people in 2...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0258302583 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60486288651 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1210385324 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218968595093 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712946559053 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839431653028 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15385035947 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844416313551 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.