The bar chart shows the share of poverty of the rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002. The pie chart shows the rural area share and the urban area share of poverty in 2002.
The bar chart illustrate the rural share of poverty in 6 different regions for the year 1993 and 2002. The pie chart shows the differences in the percentage of poverty for the urban and the rural class. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the percentage of poverty in rural areas gradually decreased from 1993 to 2002. It is also evident that the number of people living a poor life are more in coutryside than in the city.
To begin with, the proportion of poverty remained the same in East Asia and Pacific for both the years( 90% in 1993 and 90% in 2002). However, the poverty share in the Middle East and North Africa experienced a fall in 2002 as compared to that in 1993. It was around 85% in 1993 whereas in the next 9 years, this share slighty dropped to 80%. The poverty share of both, the South Asia and the Sub-Saharan Africa region remained the same in 1993(approximately 88%). However, this rate seems to have fallen to around 70% for the later in the year 2002 while it dropped by only 1% for the former.
Furthermore, the lowest poverty rate recorded in 1993 was in Europe and Central Asia, it was 50%. However, this rate spiked to 65% in 2002. Similar kind of situation was observed for the region of Latin America and Carribean, which had poverty percentage around 50%, but this time this percentage went down and landed at 40% in 2002. The poverty rates for the rural area were more than double than that of the urban area. It was 76% for rural area and only 24% for the urban area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-19 | Riddhi Gohil | 64 | view |
- Some people believe that history has no value in the contemporary world But some believe that we still need history to learn from the past 67
- The bar chart shows the share of poverty of the rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002 The pie chart shows the rural area share and the urban area share of poverty in 2002 64
- Some people believe that history has no value in the contemporary world But some believe that we still need history to learn from the past 73
- Some people believe that history has no value in the contemporary world But some believe that we still need history to learn from the past 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, whereas, while, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47142857143 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34298780123 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471428571429 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5725759999 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4285714286 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451183632674 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166058334519 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12353683147 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319128368583 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121041781716 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.4159519038 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, whereas, while, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47142857143 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34298780123 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471428571429 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5725759999 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4285714286 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451183632674 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166058334519 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12353683147 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319128368583 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121041781716 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.4159519038 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.