Many individuals are of the opinion that reading story books is more beneficial than watching television or playing e-games on the computer. From my perspective, I completely agree with this statement and will analyze my point of view in the essay below.
To begin with, children’s imagination can be augmented by reading books in comparison to playing computer games and watching TV. By reading books filled with marvellous and impressive stories, children have to use their imagination to create visions and visualize all the events detailed in the books in order to discover fascinating things through single pages. Therefore, by means of creating images, thoughts, and opinions, children will enhance their imaginativeness and creativity. Meanwhile, this can hardly be the case for TV and games, as they provide kids with full images and vivid colors, making it superfluous for kids to envision.
Admittedly, being engaged in playing games on a computer and watching television is undeniably great fun as a wonderful stress reliever, but games are only games. In contrast, story book reading is associated with a multitude of educational benefits, one of which is the cultivation of emotions. In other words, it helps kids be more sympathetic and elegant. If children laugh or cry with the characters in the books, they will gradually develop feelings of love for other human beings in real life. Furthermore, children will be exposed to a wide range of vocabulary as well as sentence structures when reading, leading to their better writing skills, while when it comes to TV shows or computer games, sounds and images are two key elements rather than texts.
In conclusion, my firm conviction is that the advantages of reading books far outweigh those of watching TV or playing games for children, since this activity does good for their imagination, emotions, and language ability.
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor bike To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 95
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 87
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 92
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2904290429 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91345314309 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.283911572 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.583333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314690013116 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116862636914 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087274912788 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202598008912 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144089747754 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.