Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
While some people believe that young people do not influence the major decisions that determine the future of society, I disagree with the statement for the following reasons that I will explore in the ensuing paragraph.
Firstly, young people are more likely to be aware of the new technological advancement at its incredibly rapid pace. In other words, they are more familiar with contemporary electronic gadgets and their complex functions than elderly individuals. That is because of their advanced education compared to several decades ago. Therefore, they have the essential knowledge to transform and impact society in decision-making to create a better world to live in. My personal experience is an illustration of this concept. My husband and I wanted to buy a new house, and we were looking for our perfect place, but we were confused. Thus, we asked our son, who helped us tremendously. He suggested that we better look for a modern and smart one that allows us to control machines remotely through our mobile devices. We took his suggestions seriously and got our dream house. This house is convenient and makes our lives more comfortable with that intelligent technology. We would not have found the dream home if I had not included my son in this critical decision.
Secondly, Incorporating young people into decision-making processes is pivotal for society's national security. In other words, excluding youth and ignoring their standpoints harm the nation's cohesion because they have the notion and capacity to alter the world. They are looking for opportunities to do so. Thus, accommodating them as a part of society will assist in conveying their energy and viewpoints to the right place. The civil rights revolution is a compelling example of this. If people in charge had involved these young people from the start, they have never felt the urge to call for civil rights. Accordingly, youth are a part of society that we cannot ignore or underestimate their perspectives. They keep society adhered together.
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 73
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmospheric pre 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children has become more difficult task because now children spend more time on cell phone online games and social web site Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- A huge marine mammal known as Steller s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia It was described in 1741 by Georg W Steller a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see one In 1768 the animal became extinct 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d we were looking for our perfect place, but we were confused. Thus, we asked our...
^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in this critical decision. Secondly, Incorporating young people into decision...
^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...and ignoring their standpoints harm the nations cohesion because they have the notion a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15454545455 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91823216546 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59696969697 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7556721383 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.05 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183714783263 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507478914902 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765194411765 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17913207686 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124913277564 0.0645574589148 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.