Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe that there are better alternative ways of reducing crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A highly controversial phenomenon today relates to whether increasing punishment is the most effective approach to minimize crime or whether there are various issues to tackle with the crime. In this essay, I believe that several other measures could be considered to minimize offenders.
Locking criminals in prison for long periods of time has a direct influence on the crime rate. Due to the difficulty of seeking work, most criminals who are released from jail return to commit serious crimes. As a result, implementing additional years in prison has been preventing the majority of criminals in communities from increasing, suggesting that this strategy will have a positive impact on the crime rate. Furthermore, stronger punishment teaches offenders the significance of facing serious consequences after breaking the code as crimes. Therefore, individuals will have to visualize being involved in committing profound crimes that they are aware of the possibility of experiencing a very prolonged duration in prison.
In reality, there are additional measures that can considerably diminish the volume of crimes in the long-term. First and foremost, governments should invest more of their national resources in the education system. When a substantial proportion of the population is well-educated and capable of civilized attitudes, they become less likely to commit crimes and conduct these issues. In other words, this investment will significantly decrease the risk of individuals participating in negative behaviors. Secondly, public areas should be equipped with security cameras and managed by more police officers. This means that suspect individuals and behaviors are constantly monitored in order to prevent any potential crime situations.
In conclusion, while extended punishments are such an effective method for reducing crime inherently, I strongly believe that governments should examine numerous possible solutions to the criminal issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-22 | LUCIALUSO | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-20 | tran ngoc lam | 87 | view |
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The Graph below shows the working hours for men and women in the developing world between the years 1998 to 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever necessary 78
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Writing task 1 The graphs show the changes in the UK industry steel between 1970 and 2000 n v million tonnes vs thousand 84
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What are your opinions on this? 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07217964199 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5233618687 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140130189912 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453807311238 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338474310286 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877454814689 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140841409485 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07217964199 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5233618687 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140130189912 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453807311238 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338474310286 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877454814689 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140841409485 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.