Some people believe governments should spend money in saving the languages of a few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that the question of whether to allocate a budget in preserving endangered languages in small regions or not remains a source of controversy in financial fields. While a number of people believe that expenditure in protecting these languages is an effective way to conserve language diversity, I would argue that it is wasteful
On the one hand, it is commonly said that it is the government's duty to conserve endangered tongues. Language is an essential part of a daily basis to unite humans together. Loss of language is loss of culture and identity, which reduces the cultural diversity of a nation. AS a result, the government should take initiatives and allocate a budget to prevent endangered tongues from disappearing.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that protecting these languages is a waste of money for two main reasons. For one thing, the languages of a few people in limited areas are not suitable and misunderstandable for a great number of people. These tongues hinder human communication and trade as well, especially in the era of globalization when demand for unity is vital. For example, adolescents now have a tendency to learn the English language which is an international language instead of studying the languages of a few people. Another reason is that it is essential for the government to expand in other vital fields such as education, infrastructure, and society to develop the economy. Therefore, it is a waste of financial resources to preserve these old languages.
In conclusion, although expenditure in conserving the tongues of a few people in small areas is necessary, it seems to me that it is a waste of public money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-28 | Trần Thị Ngọc Mai | 73 | view |
- With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas 73
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving the languages of a few speakers from dying out completely Others think this is a waste of financial resources Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas 67
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 67
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether to allocate a budget in preserving enda...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xpenditure in protecting these languages is an effective way to conserve language...
^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsity, I would argue that it is wasteful On the one hand, it is commonly said tha...
^^^
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...and, it is commonly said that it is the governments duty to conserve endangered tongues. La...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, for one thing, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00357142857 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11947266279 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496428571429 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9974999375 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210249177646 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780520495767 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439165503228 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123006246531 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260956076359 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether to allocate a budget in preserving enda...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xpenditure in protecting these languages is an effective way to conserve language...
^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsity, I would argue that it is wasteful On the one hand, it is commonly said tha...
^^^
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...and, it is commonly said that it is the governments duty to conserve endangered tongues. La...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, for one thing, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00357142857 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11947266279 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496428571429 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9974999375 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210249177646 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780520495767 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439165503228 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123006246531 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260956076359 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.