Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
The preference and prevalence of non-domestic films have raised highly intense debate among the public. This article aims at elaborating upon the phenomenon, ascribing the industrialization of films to that. Therefore authorities should subsidize the domestic film industry.
The public attraction of films varied with time. Formerly, films, as same as other genres of art, were utilized by talented artists to express their attitudes, feelings, and opinions, when their masterpieces served for a tiny group of people with the same artistic inclination. As a result, those who adhered to the creators’ cultural background, namely domestic audiences, were willing to watch their films. Several years later, films had stepped down the alter of strict art, and generally became an entertainment of the populace. In this duration, films with gorgeous pictures and fabulous plots, and intriguing sounds could relax ordinary people who are immersed in the mundane grind. Hence, the film industry emerged and went ripe. Now that this form of film attracts all of the people, only can the best ones of which survive, such as Hollywood and Dream Factory. These developed film factories locate in some countries, and people in other countries have no choice but to watch foreign movies. In other words, they prefer the best movies rather than foreign movies. If the domestic film industry produced excellent movies, not only citizens in this country would watch the movies, but also people in other countries would fall in love with these masterpieces.
Given that the attraction of foreign movies attributes to the quality of movies, it is advantageous for governments to subsidize the domestic film industry to encourage and uphold its development. By that, governments can facilitate the production of attractive domestic movies and divert the public to them. Nevertheless, it must emphasize that the subsidy could be not instrumental, for the subsidy may hamper the advance of film factories and studios, who can feed them up by the financial support and lose their antennae, whereas laissez-faire policy and full competition are the essential reason of the success of extant film industry. Since that, any financial support of the domestic film industry should be under full consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the industrialization of films to that. Therefore authorities should subsidize the domest...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ral years later, films had stepped down the alter of strict art, and generally became an ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 773, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...pe. Now that this form of film attracts all of the people, only can the best ones of which...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3938547486 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8483910119 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7829060676 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.588235294 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0588235294 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375471995245 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125737095968 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601317990463 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252625465315 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160933711108 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.