The graph reveals how many females per 100 male students attended various schools in two separate categories during a 10-year-periods from 1990 to 2000, with a prediction until 2005. Overall, there was a significant difference between the genders' enrolments in developed countries and developing ones. Additionally, the category of “boys” always outnumbered that of “girls” except for females who enrolled in tertiary school.
In terms of developing countries, the higher educational levels get, the fewer girls engaged in this. To be exact, this figure accounted for the average of 85 female students per 100 male students, 77 girls per 100 boys, and approximately 71 females per 100 males who enrolled in the primary, secondary and tertiary schools respectively. However, there was a slight growth in the figure for developing countries from 1990 to 2000 with its value increased by about 8 females at each education level.
An opposite pattern occurred in the number of enrolled students in developed countries. Regarding the category of primary and secondary schools, these figures grew from 93 to 96 girls per 100 boys for the former and from 98 to 99 females per 100 males for the latter from 1990 to 2000. Noticeably, the number of girls who engaged in tertiary school was higher than that of boys, at over 100 females compared with 100 males in these years surveyed. Additionally, it is projected that there will be no gender gap in all education levels in the year 2005.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, second, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10655737705 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84433315922 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2685321167 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19612166358 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886776503675 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337665145236 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153737255207 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027966959846 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.