The line graph illustrates the proportion of people who were born in Asia, the UK, and other regions inhabited in Australia between 1976 to 2011.
It is clear that the percentage of people born in Asia increased significantly throughout the period while this figure for the UK had a declining trend.
Starting at about 14% in 1976, the UK had the highest percentage of people living in Australia. However, this figure continuously declined to hit a low of around 5% in 2011. By contrast, the proportion of people living in Asia was at the lowest point at around 3% in 1976. From 1976 to 2011, the percentage of people living in Asia surged dramatically from about 3% to 15%. The other countries saw a considerable fall from 12% to around 7% in the first 10 years before significantly grew in the number of residents living in Australia from about 7% to around 14%.
Turning to the total, with around 23% of all the population, the total population in Australia ranked the highest in comparison with the others 3. The years between 1976 to 2001 saw a considerable decline in the proportion of residents from about 25% to around 20% before there was a significant rise in the percent of inhabitant to 25% in the last year.
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 791603 11
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 100
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 61
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67592592593 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77874982992 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3792402008 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32251832364 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150940025736 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124618494217 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221845962702 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131312449038 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.