The pie charts below show the comparision of different kinds of energy production in
France in two years.
The pie charts compare how many percentages of 5 different powers were created in France
during 10 years.
Overall, What stands out from the graph is that there were 2 opposite trends for 5 figures.
While Coal, Nuclear, and other energies had upward trends, Petro was only a power that
declined gradually. Besides that, Gas and Coal both generated the most during the period
mentioned.
Looking at the graph for more details, Coal kept the highest place with 29,80% at the
beginning of the period, while, in the next 10 years, it continued to progress and still the first
place at 30,93 percent. Similarly, Gas also was responsible for 29,63% in 1995 then rising
slightly by approximately 1% over the period of 10 years.
Then turns to the other 3 features, 29,27% was the proportion which Petro was created in
France in the first years of the period, after declining markedly to 19,55%, especially, since it
is the only feature that had a downward trend during the given period. On the other hand,
Nuclear and other powers had the opposite trend as Petro and starting at approximately 5%,
then growing up to 10,10 and 9,10 percent 10 years later.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 73
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 11
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 11
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, look, similarly, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89447236181 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4381130703 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608040201005 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4578369519 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0741515606734 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378003227949 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587340654561 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0296531623441 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059588162085 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.