Most of museums have an entry fee whereas others have free entry. In my opinion, there are many benefits of charging people for entry to museums than losses.
There are few disadvantages of having an entry price to a museum. Firstly majority of people cannot afford that entry amount if it is high. So, few people visit museums. Secondly, everyone will not have an opportunity to visit museums as poor people cannot afford that amount which can be used for their food and shelter. As a result, only the people who can pay the admission fee can gain knowledge by visiting museums.
However, there are many advantages of charging admission cost to museums which outweigh the disadvantages. Finally, maintenance cost of the museums can be covered with amount paid for the entry. Secondly, discovering the monuments involves a lot of hard work. This can be balanced with the help of admission prices. Thirdly, we can have many number of museums since there will be only few museums if they provide free entry to museums. There will be few museums because maintaining the museums will be expensive. If there are more number of museums, then people can visit many museums and gain more knowledge about precious items used in the past generation. Fourthly, many discoveries will be made about the valuables used in the previous generation as these can be placed in any museum. As a result, we will get to know about many important monuments or tools in the past.
In conclusion, the gains of having an admission charge to the museums exceed the losses of having it since many museums may close if all the people are allowed to enter museums without paying any costs.
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Relannian newspaper Industry analysts report that the number of dairy farms in Relanna has increased by 25 percent over the last decade Also recent innovations in milking technology make it possible fo 70
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 50
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 56
- The following appeared in a memo from the president of Bower Builders a company that constructs new homes A nationwide survey reveals that the two most desired home features are a large family room and a large well appointed kitchen A number of homes in o 53
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of the Juniper Caf a small local coffee shop in the downtown area of a small American city We must reduce overhead here at the caf Instead of opening at 6 a m weekdays we will now open at 8 a m On week 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the museums') or simply say ''Most museums''.
Suggestion: Most of the museums; Most museums
Most of museums have an entry fee whereas others have f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
... admission prices. Thirdly, we can have many number of museums since there will be only few...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84965034965 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49252636134 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465034965035 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0539353234 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5882352941 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347496738673 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126740939384 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100387964121 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244277486644 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500541393159 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.