The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 year
The chart illustrates the number of waste products from companies A, B, and C from 2000 to 2015
It is clear that the number of waste products of companies A and B witnessed a significant decrease, the opposite was true for the tone of waste produced in company C
In 2000, the amount of the waste products of company A was the highest with 12 tones, while the waste produced by company C was less than 3 times the waste produced by company A. Company B just had about 8 tones waste production in 2000. In the next 5 years, there was a decrease in the waste produced by company A to 11 tones. Companies B and C increased the waste production, respectively 10 and 6 tones.
From 2005 to 2015, the company A and B saw a significant decrease in the amount of waste produced. The amount of waste production’s company B also dramatically went down to 3 tones. On contract, there was a gradual increase in the tone of waste production of company C from 6 tones in 2005 to 9 tones in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 56
- In many parts of the world children are now given more freedom than they used to have Is this a positive or negative development 61
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 year 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32258064516 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76446573188 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430107526882 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 125.382679532 43.030603864 291% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266291234942 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154631594008 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572260307044 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185750109573 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651507382358 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32258064516 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76446573188 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430107526882 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 125.382679532 43.030603864 291% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266291234942 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154631594008 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572260307044 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185750109573 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651507382358 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.